Interesting discoveries are made every single day, and scientists, researchers, archaeologists and historians are constantly carrying out tests in order for us to better understand the world around us. Every so often though these discoveries will requires more studies, and sometimes even after these have been completed we are left asking questions.
Do these and similar phenomena near the Moon support the hollow moon theory and the claims that the moon is actually an artificial satellite built by aliens?
Sponsored
NOTE:
The hollow moon theory is a controversial hypothesis that suggests that the moon is actually a hollow, artificial object rather than a naturally occurring celestial body. This theory has been proposed by some proponents of alternative and fringe science, who argue that there is evidence to support the idea that the moon is an artificial structure.
One of the main arguments put forth by proponents of the hollow moon theory is the fact that the moon’s density is much lower than that of Earth. The moon is made up of rock, dust, and other materials, but it is much less dense than the Earth, which is mostly made up of iron and other dense elements. This low density has led some to speculate that the moon must be hollow, as it would otherwise be much denser.
Another argument often cited in support of the hollow moon theory is the fact that the moon’s surface is pockmarked with a large number of craters and other features that suggest it has been subjected to a great deal of impact over the course of its existence. Some proponents of the theory argue that these features could not have been created naturally, and must have been the result of some sort of artificial construction.
Despite these arguments, the vast majority of scientists and researchers reject the hollow moon theory, pointing out that there is no solid evidence to support it. In fact, there is a great deal of evidence that supports the idea that the moon is a naturally occurring celestial body. For example, the moon’s composition is consistent with that of other celestial bodies in the solar system, and there are no indications that it was constructed by intelligent beings.
In conclusion, the hollow moon theory is a highly controversial and fringe hypothesis that lacks scientific support. While it may be an interesting idea to consider, there is no evidence to suggest that the moon is anything other than a naturally occurring celestial body.
Sponsored
